The Islamic Conquest's Plunder of Palestine
In the seventh century Southern Arabia, evolved
the formation of the successful pattern that
was to be perpetuated in the propagation of the Arabian Muslim creed. Those
Jews who escaped withtheir lives became perhaps the first Arabian refugees.
They were the beginning link in the long chain of Jews to be plundered
by "immigrant" Muslims of the "Arab" world, who would exact their reward
as their new faith permitted, even prescribed them to do.
It is likely that among the Jewish refugees
fleeing from Arabia were numbers of Jews whose "Palestinian" -- or Judean
-- ancestors had fled from the Romans. Now they returned to seventh-century
Palestine, joining their Jewish brethren who had never left. Ironically,
the Jewish refugees' return coincided with the introduction of the Arab
conquerors from the desert; the very invaders who had forced themselves
in and the Jews out of their homes in Arabia would now plunder Judah-Palestina
in the identical pattern.
And the Jews who inhabited many towns of
"Palestine" uninterruptedly would one day in the twentieth century be forced
out as the Arabian Jews had been -- by slaughter or expropriation and terrorizing.
The towns would then, in the later twentieth century, be touted as
"purely Arab Palestinian areas since time immemorial," just as the Arabian
Peninsula had come to be perceived as "purely Arab," when in fact the holy
Arab Muslim city of Medina had been originally settled by Jews.
After the seventh-century invasion of Medina-the
beginning of the Arab conquest in Arabia -- where we have seen the settled
Jews conquered by the "Arabians," Caliph Omar was ruling over the vanquished
tribes when he received word from his general that Arabian invaders had
"I have captured a city from the
description of which I shall refrain. Suffice it to say that I have seized
therein 4,000 villas with 4,000 baths, 40,000 poll-tax paying Jews
and four hundred places of entertainment for the royalty."
The Arabs who invaded Judah-cum-Palestine
followed that precedent. Upon the invasion of Palestine, the "Arabians
of the desert" found a Palestinian Jewish community of major proportion.
Shortly after the Arab conquest, the Jews would again assert their nationalistic
goals, rising in part from the infliction of the new dhimma restrictions
and humiliations that were to become the fate of all non-Muslims.
Omar II was the religious zealot
who instituted many of the restrictions
Those Jews who had remained in Roman "Palestine,"
together with the Jewish communities who quickly returned after the Roman
conquest, had succeeded in "mould[ing] Judaism in a new stamp." Although
the revered Temple had been destroyed, the synagogue remained to "soften
the blow" and Jewish leaders who had escaped from the siege of Jerusalem
were permitted by Roman leaders to return, and to teach the form of Judaism
that was to preserve and perpetuate the "aggressive Jewish nationalism"
that finally achieved political reclaiming of the land nearly twenty centuries
... These restrictions were, no doubt,
responsible for the rising of the pseudo-Messiah Syrene, . . . a Syrian
Jew, [who had] promised to ... regain possession of the Holy Land for Jewish
Ironically, it was thus those very Roman
leaders who had conquered the Jewish State and destroyed the Jewish
Temple who helped unwittingly to initiate the means by which the Jewish
National Liberation movement would remain intact. Had the Romans permitted
the Jews to retain their sovereignty, the Jews might have been relegated
to archaic history as had the Hittites, the Philistines, and other long-extinct
peoples of the region. Although the tenacious Jewish history before the
Romans would indicate otherwise, one might ponder the Jews' fate if the
Jewish people and their way of worship had been a matter of indifference
rather than the traditional object of resentment and suspicion born of
In the centuries between the Roman dismantling
of the Jewish sovereign state and the Arab invasion, the Jews' population
had "remained as ... before the loss of independence, primarily peasants
and landowners." The Jewish population -- between five and seven million
in A.D. 70, according to Josephus -- still numbered around three million,
despite large numbers of Jews who were deported or had fled just before
the Jewish revolt and defeat of Bat Kochba. According to Roman figures,
nearly 600,000 Jews alone fell during that revolt, but the Jews managed
to remain on the land and to accomplish significant achievements afterward.
The centers of Jewish life occasionally
shifted in importance -- after the revolt of Bar Kochba the nucleus of
the Jewish community moved to Galilee for a time. But the Romans, because
they recognized the Jewish hereditary Patriarchate as "the supreme . .
. authority" for the total Jewish community in the empire, inadvertently
provided the Jews with a political-religious center that had the practical
effect of replacing -- though never pre-empting -- the grievously lost
Temple. The result was that the Jewish identity with the Jewish nation
As the British Royal Commission would report
in 1937, almost 2,000 years afterward,
Always . . . since the fall of
the Jewish state some Jews have been living in Palestine .... Fresh immigrants
arrived from time to time ... [and] settled mainly in Galilee, in numerous
villages spreading northwards to the Lebanon and in the towns of Safad
and Tiberias. 
According to reports of the various periods
of history, some of the Jewish enclaves managed to remain in their original
places for thousands of years. The Jews were numerous in Judah-cum-Palestine
and the Christians proportionately few in the third and fourth centuries."
And for a rare and brief moment there was peace. The historian de Haas
The East breathed more freely,
and enjoyed even a spell of real peace during the reign of Alexander Severus
(222-235).... His predilections brought him the nickname of Archisynagogus,
or rabbi. He flirted with the Jews, and his mother, Julia Mammae, protected
the great church father, Origen. This catholicity was even exhibited in
the imperial palace, where pictures of Orpheus, Jesus, and Abraham, hung
side by side."
But Professor Lewis reminds that
In Palestine, the Jews, still
an important element, if no longer the majority of the population, had
suffered even more grievously than the heretical Christians from Byzantine
repression, and had little love for their masters."
The "bullying orthodoxy" of the growing Byzantium
diminished the Jews' political, civil, and even religious rights in the
fifth century. The Reverend Parkes reports that, by the time the Persians
invaded in A.D. 611, the Jews had been persecuted long enough so that the
"Persians received substantial help from the Jews of Galilee" -- an estimated
20,000 to 26,000 Jewish soldiers. The Persians' occupation ended after
On the eve of the introduction of the Arabian
to Palestine, the Christians briefly reoccupied Palestine in A.D. 629.
Because the Jews had cooperated with the Persians, "the clergy of Jerusalem
thought only of revenge," and inspired a "bloody massacre ... of Jews."
Neither Christian nor Jew realized that
within a few years the Arabian invasion would bring Byzantine rule to an
end, and many of those inhabitants who had once converted to Byzantine
now would adopt the tongue, religion, and, briefly, the rule of the Arabs.
When we look back over the history
of the early Caliphates -- and we must do, so, since the present hopes
and pretensions of the Arabs, and the popular belief, their coming Renaissance
rest equally on ancient history -- we find the period of genuine Arab Empire
extraordinarily short. Arabs governed Arabs, through Arabs on an imperial
scale for much less than a century. It is just the Omayyad Caliphate --
the Damascus period and no more.
Thsu was the comparatively recent Arab propaganda
claim of Palestine as an "Arab" country for "millennia" disproved by the
historian David George Hogarth in 1877. Hogarth was described by eminent
Arab writers as "one of the greatest authorities of his time on Arabian
The Reverend James Parkes has agreed that
The period during which the empire
was ruled from Damascus and can be called "Arab" empire, lasted less than
a century and even in that short time it had gun to decline."
Noting that decline, the prominent Arab historian
Philip Hitti also explained how "Arab" invaders were "diluted" by converts:
Through their intermarriages with
the conquering stock they served to dilute the Arabian blood and ultimately
to make that element inconspicuous amidst the mixture of varied racial
The "Arab" rule as such had been precluded
before A.D. 750. According to Hitti,
... the invaders from the desert brought
with them no tradition of learning, no heritage of culture, to the lands
Shortly before the middle of the
eighth century a caliph ascended to the Umayyad throne who had been born
of a slave mother .... His two successors, the last in the dynasty, were
also sons of slave women .... That the reigning family could no longer
boast pure Arab blood was symptomatic of a loosening of moral standards
Hitti pointed out the destructive element
of tribal warfare that contributed heavily to the ravages of Palestine.
The position of the Omayyad dynasty,
weakened by this decadence, was further undermined by the increasingly
sharp division of North Arabian as against South Arabian tribes. This
racial tendency to separatism, apparent even in pre-Islamic days, now
became complete and was the cause of boundless dispute. 
The findings of even those historians most
vaunted by the Arab world have been specific in their contradiction of
Arab claims to historical right of sovereignty in the land of "Palestine."
The Arabs never created their own name for the land they now claim as their
own. Neither was there ever an independent country of Palestine, nor a
"Palestinian" rule. The word "Palestine" was given to the land of Judea
by the Romans when Roman conquerors unsuccessfully attempted to purge the
land of the "nationalistic," obstinate Jews.
"The brevity of purely Arab Empire was
determined less by the force of non-Arab elements than by the inability
of Arabs themselves to develop any system of imperial administration more
adequate than the Patriarchal," Hogarth determined.
"The short ... Meccan period was all conquest
and raiding accompanied by no more organization of territories overrun
than would secure their payment of, tribute."
"The long Baghdad period" was, according
to Hogarth, "not... government of Arabs by Arabs."
If the Abbassids were Meccan,
their ministers, great and often small, were Iranians or Turanians, and
their trust was in mercenaries, at first Persian, then Turk, Circassian,
Kurd -- any race but the Arabian.
Hogarth found that the same "formula" applied
to Egypt and North Africa where the ruled people as well as their governors
"What we now call 'Arab civilization' was
Arabian neither in its origins and fundamental structure nor in its principal
ethnic aspects," according to Philip Hitti.
Throughout the whole period of
the caliphate, the Syrians, the Persians, the Egyptians and others, as
Moslem converts or as Christians and Jews, were the foremost bearers of
the torch of enlightenment and learning, just as the subjugated Greeks
were in their relation to victorious Romans. The Arab Islamic civilization
was at bottom the Hellenized Aramaic and the Iranian civilizations as developed
under the aegis of the caliphate and expressed through the medium of the
The "Arab identity" is in fact largely a linguistic
commonality. Hitti defines "Arabs" as "a term which in our usage would
comprise all Arabic-speaking peoples,
including the Arabians, that is, the
inhabitants of the Arabian peninsula."
According to Hogarth, even the "extraordinarily
short" Arab rule was mechanical and not innovative.
The Omayyads alike in Syria and
Spain seemed to have carried on with the machinery they found, insisting
only after a time on expression in Arabic.
To speak historically of original inhabitants
of Judah-cum-Palestine as "Arab" peoples, then, is categorically inaccurate.
Not only was there no country of "Palestine," never a "Palestinian" Arab
rule, there was only an "extraordinarily short" period of time -- a matter
of decades -- when any Arabs ruled Arabs on that land.
The first Arabian use of the word
Arab occurs in the ancient southern Arabian inscriptions.... dating from
the late pre-Christian and early Christian centuries. In these, Arab means
Bedouin, often raider, and is applied to the nomadic as distinct
from the sedentary population....
For Muhammad and his contemporaries
the Arabs were the Bedouin of the desert, and in the Qur'an the term is
used exlusively in this sense and never of the townsfolk of Mecca, Medina
and other Cities." 
Islam was the "national religion and war-cry"
and the new empire was "their booty" as the conquering Arabians -- or Arabs
-- briefly invaded and ruled over "a vast variety of peoples differing
in race, language and religion, among whom [the Arabs] formed a ... minority,"
according to Professor Bernard Lewis. 
The use of the adjective Arab
to describe the various facets of this civilization has often been challenged
on the grounds that the contribution to "Arab medicine," "Arab philosophy,"
etc. of those who were of Arab descent was relatively small. Even the use
of the word Muslim is criticized, since so many of the architects of this
culture were Christians and Jews .... 
The Prophet Muhammad, Arabian creator of Islam,
had quickly determined to gain followers, plunder must be bountiful.
So little was the first wave of
the Arab conquest an exclusive product of religious fanaticism, offering
the conquered Islam or the sword, that many of the bedouin bands who formed
the armies of Islam were in all probability still pagans when they took
part in the first great surge out of the [Arabian] peninsula.
Because the "Arabian Moslems" subscribed widely
to the Koranic invocation "Make war ... upon such of those to whom the
Book has been given until they pay tribute offered on the back of their
hands, in a state of humiliation" (9:29), Hitti concluded that
Not fanaticism but economic necessity
drove the Bedouin hordes ... beyond the confines of their and abode to
the fair lands of the north.... Far from being entirely the result of deliberate
and cool calculation, the campaigns seem to have started as raids
to provide new outlets for the warring spirit of the tribes now forbidden
to engage in fratricidal combats, the objective in most cases being
booty and not the gaining of a permanent foothold." 
The Arabs ruled Arabs for only some decades,
not millennia, and only under the Omayyads, who were the lone dynasty of
"Arab" stock. The victory of Abassids was Islamic, not Arab, and "it was
Islam and not Arab blood which formed the basis of unity." Within a
hundred or so years, the "successive usurpers" of power were almost entirely
"of Turkish origin."
This page was produced by Joseph
Middle Eastern Political and Religious
Brooklyn, New York
to a friend
Source: "From Time Immemorial" by Joan
OFFER Purchase this national bestseller available at WorldNetDaily